Teaching and Learning in the 21st Century: Between Human Potential and Artificial Intelligence

Volume 10, Issue 4, August 2025     |     PP. 156-180      |     PDF (415 K)    |     Pub. Date: August 26, 2025
DOI: 10.54647/education880613    13 Downloads     139 Views  

Author(s)

Stavissky Yuliya, Al- Qasemi Academy, Lecturer, Department of Education, Israel

Abstract
This mixed-methods study explores the pedagogical, emotional, and ethical implications of integrating generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools into educational settings. Drawing on both qualitative interviews and quantitative Likert-scale questionnaires, the research investigates how AI influences students’ learning processes, intrinsic motivation, and the evolving role of teachers. The study is grounded in Self-Determination Theory (SDT) and heutagogical frameworks, examining the balance between technological efficiency and human-centered learning.
Findings reveal a complex interplay: while AI enhances access to information and fosters initial engagement, it may undermine deep learning and reduce students' sense of autonomy and ownership. Teachers, in turn, experience a shift in their professional identity—from knowledge transmitters to ethical mentors and emotional guides in an AI-mediated classroom. Statistical analysis supports the qualitative insights, showing that high-frequency AI users report lower levels of intrinsic motivation and reduced reliance on critical thinking strategies.
The study contributes original knowledge by identifying the emotional cost of cognitive outsourcing and highlighting the need to preserve reflective, ethical, and relational dimensions of education. These findings challenge dominant techno-centric narratives and propose a more balanced approach where AI supports—rather than substitutes—human learning and development.

Keywords
Generative Artificial Intelligence in Education Self-Determination Theory (SDT) Heutagogical Learning Intrinsic Motivation and Autonomy Cognitive Offloading / Cognitive Outsourcing Teacher Role Transformation Critical Thinking Skills Ethical Dimensions of Technology Integration Human-Centered Pedagogy

Cite this paper
Stavissky Yuliya, Teaching and Learning in the 21st Century: Between Human Potential and Artificial Intelligence , SCIREA Journal of Education. Volume 10, Issue 4, August 2025 | PP. 156-180. 10.54647/education880613

References

[ 1 ] Ahn, J. (2021). Artificial intelligence and student learning: A review of recent research and recommendations for educators. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09979-9
[ 2 ] Alamri, A., & Alshammari, S. (2023). The impact of heutagogy on learners’ autonomy and engagement in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 197–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11734-7
[ 3 ] Anderson, M., & Rainie, L. (2023). The evolution of human expertise in the age of AI. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2023/01/11/the-evolution-of-human-expertise-in-the-age-of-ai/
[ 4 ] Chen, X., & Sun, L. (2020). Emotional engagement and student learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 90(3), 339–376. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320914741
[ 5 ] Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2022). Mobile learning and artificial intelligence: A review of research trends. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(2), 317–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13141
[ 6 ] Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2020). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.
[ 7 ] Dennen, V. P., & Burner, K. J. (2020). Cognitive engagement and the role of reflection in online learning environments. Internet and Higher Education, 47, 100–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100731
[ 8 ] González, L., & Ortega, M. (2022). AI and student creativity: Enhancing or inhibiting? Computers & Education, 185, 104528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104528
[ 9 ] Greenhow, C., & Askari, E. (2021). Learning and teaching with social media in higher education: A review. Educational Psychology Review, 33, 49–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09503-3
[ 10 ] Heinonen, O., & Ryymin, E. (2023). Reflective practices and emotional literacy in AI-driven education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 33, 230–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-022-00284-2
[ 11 ] Jones, C., & Healing, G. (2020). Networks of learners: Patterns of interaction in AI-facilitated classrooms. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(3), 334–346. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12409
[ 12 ] Kimmons, R., & Rosenberg, J. M. (2022). Critical pedagogy and artificial intelligence in education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 54(4), 381–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1852507
[ 13 ] Luckin, R., & Cukurova, M. (2020). Designing AI for education: The importance of teacher and student agency. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(6), 1949–1960. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12992
[ 14 ] Merrill, M. D. (2021). First principles of instruction and technology-enhanced learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69, 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09844-3
[ 15 ] Mishra, P., & Warr, M. (2023). Creativity in the age of AI: Can humans and machines co-create meaningfully? TechTrends, 67, 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-023-00837-y
[ 16 ] Ng, W. (2022). Promoting digital literacy and agency among students: A heutagogical approach. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 60(6), 1501–1523. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331221089284
[ 17 ] Popenici, S. A. D., & Kerr, S. (2020). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 15(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-020-00128-9
[ 18 ] Reynolds, R. (2021). Intrinsic motivation in digital learning environments: A synthesis of research. Educational Psychology Review, 33(2), 553–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09546-6
[ 19 ] Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2023). The self-determination theory perspective on motivation in educational contexts: Recent developments. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 73, 102139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102139
[ 20 ] Santos, L., & Peres, P. (2021). Student autonomy and AI: Conflicting goals or potential synergy? AI & Society, 36, 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01133-4
[ 21 ] Selwyn, N. (2022). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Learning, Media and Technology, 47(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2022.2029694
[ 22 ] Simons, P. R.-J., & Ruijters, M. C. P. (2023). AI-supported reflection and meaningful learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 250–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12479
[ 23 ] Thompson, A. D., & Brooks, D. C. (2024). Critical digital pedagogy in the age of AI. Educational Technology & Society, 27(1), 12–23. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48640382
[ 24 ] Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2020). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00200-2