Author(s)
H. Van Cong, Université de Perpignan Via Domitia, Laboratoire de Mathématiques et Physique (LAMPS), EA 4217, Département de Physique, 52, Avenue Paul Alduy, F-66 860 Perpignan, France.

Abstract
In our two previous papers [1, 2], referred to as I and II. In I, our new expression for the extrinsic static dielectric constant, \varepsilon\left(r_{d\left(a\right)}\right), r_{d\left(a\right)} being the donor (acceptor) d(a)-radius, was determined by using an effective Bohr model, suggesting that, for an increasing r_{d\left(a\right)}, \varepsilon\left(r_{d\left(a\right)}\right), due to such the impurity size effect, decreases, and affecting strongly the critical impurity density in the metal-insulator transition and also various majority carrier transport coefficients given in the n(p)-type degenerate InP-crystal, defined for the reduced Fermi energy \mathbf{\xi}_{\mathbf{n}(\mathbf{p})}(\geqq\mathbf{1}). Then, using the same physical model and same mathematical methods and taking into account the corrected values of energy-band-structure parameters, all the numerical results, obtained in II, are now revised and performed, giving rise to some important concluding remarks, as follows.(1) The critical donor(acceptor)-density, N_{CDn\left(NDp\right)}(r_{d(a)}), determined in Eq. (3), can be explained by the densities of electrons (holes) localized in exponential conduction (valance)-band (EBT) tails, N_{CDn\left(CDp\right)}^{EBT}(r_{d(a)}), given in Eq. (21). (2) In Tables 9-11, for a given d(a)-density N [\geq2N_{CDn\left(NDp\right)}(r_{d(a)})] one notes here that with increasing temperature T(K): (i) for reduced Fermi energy \xi_{n(p)}(=1.813), while the numerical results of the Seebeck coefficient Sb present a same minimum (maximum) \left(=\left(\mp\right)1.563\times{10}^{-4}\frac{V}{K}\right), those of the figure of merit ZT show a same maximum ZT\left(=\mathbf{1}\right), (ii) for \xi_n=1, those of Sb and ZT present same results: Sb\left(=\left(\mp\right)1.322\times{10}^{-4}\frac{V}{K}\right) and 0.715, respectively, (iii) for \xi_{n(p)}=1.813 and \xi_{n(p)}=1, those of the well-known Mott figure of merit give same \left(ZT\right)_{Mott}=\frac{\pi^2}{3\times\xi_{n(p)}^2}(\simeq1 and 3.290), respectively, and finally, (iv) we show here that in the degenerate InP-semiconductor, the Wiedemann-Frank law, given in Eq. (25a), is found to be exact.

Keywords
Effects of the impurity-size and heavy doping; effective autocorrelation function for potential fluctuations; optical, electrical, and thermoelectric properties; figure of merit; Wiedemann-Franz law

Cite this paper
H. Van Cong, Same maximum figure of merit ZT(=1), due to effects of impurity size and heavy doping, obtained in the n(p)-type degenerate InP-crystal , at same reduced Fermi energy and same minimum (maximum) Seebeck coefficient , at which same , SCIREA Journal of Physics. Vol. 8 , No. 2 , 2023 , pp. 91 - 114 . https://doi.org/10.54647/physics140529

References

[ 1 ]	H. Van Cong, “New dielectric constant, due to the impurity size effect, and determined by an effective Bohr model, affecting strongly the Mott criterion in the metal-insulator transition and the optical band gap in degenerate (Si, GaAs, InP)-semiconductors, “SCIREA J. Phys., vol.7, pp. 221-234 (2022); H. Van Cong et al., “Size effect on different impurity levels in semiconductors,” Solid State Communications, vol. 49, pp. 697-699(1984).
[ 2 ]	H. Van Cong, “Effects of donor size and heavy doping on optical, electrical and thermoelectric properties of various degenerate donor-silicon systems at low temperatures,” American Journal of Modern Physics, vol. 7, pp. 136-165 (2018).
[ 3 ]	H. Van Cong et al., “A simple accurate expression of the reduced Fermi energy for any reduced carrier density. J. Appl. Phys., vol. 73, pp. 1545-15463, 1993; H. Van Cong and B. Doan Khanh, “Simple accurate general expression of the Fermi-Dirac integral and for j> -1,” Solid-State Electron., vol. 35, pp. 949-951(1992); H. Van Cong, “New series representation of Fermi-Dirac integral for arbitrary j> -1, and its effect on for integer j,” Solid-State Electron., vol. 34, pp. 489-492 (1991).
[ 4 ]	C. Kittel, “Introduction to Solid State Physics, pp. 84-100. Wiley, New York (1976).
[ 5 ]	S. Adachi, “Physical Properties of III-V Semiconductor Compounds,” John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1992.
[ 6 ]	H. Van Cong et al., “Optical bandgap in various impurity-Si systems from the metal-insulator transition study,” Physica B, vol. 436, pp. 130-139, 2014; H. Stupp et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 71, p. 2634 (1993); P. Dai et al., Phys. Rev. B, vol. 45, p. 3984 (1992).
[ 7 ]	H. Van Cong, K. C. Ho-Huynh Thi, et al., “28.68% (29.87%)- Limiting Highest Efficiencies obtained in Crystalline Silicon Junction Solar Cells at 300K, Due to the Effects of Heavy (Low) Doping and Impurity Size, “SCIREA J. Phys., vol.7, pp. 160-179, 2022; H. Van Cong, K. C. Ho-Huynh Thi, et al., “30.76% (42.73%)-Limiting Highest Efficiencies obtained in Crystalline GaAs Junction Solar Cells at 300K, Due to the Effects of Heavy (Low) Doping and Impurity Size, “SCIREA J. Phys., vo.7, pp. 180-199 (2022).
[ 8 ]	J. Wagner and J. A. del Alamo, J. Appl. Phys., vol. 63, 425-429 (1988).
[ 9 ]	P. W. Chapman, O. N. Tufte, J. D. Zook, and D. Long, Phys. Rev. 34, 3291-3295 (1963).
[ 10 ]	M. Finetti and A. M. Mazzone, J. Appl. Phys. 48, 4597-4600 (1977).
[ 11 ]	Hyun-Sik Kim et al.,”Characterization of Lorenz number with Seebeck coefficient measurement”, APL Materials 3, 041506 (2015).