*Same maximum figure of merit ZT(=1), due to effects of impurity size and heavy doping, obtained in the n(p)-type degenerate Si-crystal at same reduced Fermi energy and same minimum (maximum) Seebeck coefficient , at which same *

**DOI:**10.54647/physics140524 72 Downloads 676 Views

**Author(s)**

**Abstract**

In our two previous papers [1, 2], referred to as I and II. In I, our new expression for the extrinsic static dielectric constant, \varepsilon\left(r_{d\left(a\right)}\right), r_{d\left(a\right)} being the donor (acceptor) d(a)-radius, was determined by using an effective Bohr model, suggesting that, for an increasing r_{d\left(a\right)}, \varepsilon\left(r_{d\left(a\right)}\right), due to such the impurity size effect, decreases, and affecting strongly the critical impurity density in the metal-insulator transition and also various majority carrier transport coefficients given in the n(p)-type degenerate Si crystal, defined for the reduced Fermi energy \mathbf{\xi}_{\mathbf{n}(\mathbf{p})}(\geqq\mathbf{1}). Then, using the same physical model and same mathematical methods and taking into account the corrected values of energy-band-structure parameters, all the numerical results, obtained in II, are now revised and performed, giving rise to some important concluding remarks, as follows.(1)The critical donor(acceptor)-density, N_{CDn\left(NDp\right)}(r_{d(a)}), determined in Eq. (3), can be explained by the densities of electrons (holes) localized in exponential conduction (valance)-band (EBT) tails, N_{CDn\left(CDp\right)}^{EBT}(r_{d(a)}), given in Eq. (21).(2) In Table 5, the numerical results of the electrical conductivity, \sigma(N^\ast,r_{d(a)},T), given in Eq. (27), are obtained for the degenerate P-Si system, suggesting an accuracy of the order of 7.5%, which gives us confidence in the determination of other electrical-and-thermoelectric properties. (3) Finally, in Tables 10 and 11, one notes here that with increasing temperature T(K): (i) for reduced Fermi energy \xi_{n(p)}(=1.813), while the numerical results of the Seebeck coefficient Sb present a same minimum (maximum) \left(=\left(\mp\right)1.563\times{10}^{-4}\frac{V}{K}\right), those of the figure of merit ZT show a same maximum ZT\left(=\mathbf{1}\right), (ii) for \xi_n=1, those of Sb and those of ZT present same results: Sb\left(=\left(\mp\right)1.322\times{10}^{-4}\frac{V}{K}\right) and 0.715, respectively, (iii) for \xi_{n(p)}=1.813 and \xi_{n(p)}=1, those of the well-known Mott figure of merit give same \left(ZT\right)_{Mott}=\frac{\pi^2}{3\times\xi_{n(p)}^2}(\simeq1 and 3.290), respectively, and finally, (iv) we show here that in the degenerate Si-case, the Wiedemann-Frank, given in Eq. (25a), is found to be exact.

**Keywords**

Effects of the impurity-size and heavy doping; effective autocorrelation function for potential fluctuations; optical, electrical, and thermoelectric properties; figure of merit; Wiedemann-Franz law

**Cite this paper**

H. Van Cong,
Same maximum figure of merit ZT(=1), due to effects of impurity size and heavy doping, obtained in the n(p)-type degenerate Si-crystal at same reduced Fermi energy and same minimum (maximum) Seebeck coefficient , at which same
, *SCIREA Journal of Physics*.
Volume 9, Issue 1, February 2024 | PP. 66-90.
10.54647/physics140524

**References**

[ 1 ] | H. Van Cong, “New dielectric constant, due to the impurity size effect, and determined by an effective Bohr model, affecting strongly the Mott criterion in the metal-insulator transition and the optical band gap in degenerate (Si, GaAs, InP)-semiconductors, “SCIREA J. Phys., vol.7, pp. 221-234 (2022); H. Van Cong et al., “Size effect on different impurity levels in semiconductors,” Solid State Communications, vol. 49, pp. 697-699(1984). |

[ 2 ] | H. Van Cong, “Effects of donor size and heavy doping on optical, electrical and thermoelectric properties of various degenerate donor-silicon systems at low temperatures,” American Journal of Modern Physics, vol. 7, pp. 136-165 (2018). |

[ 3 ] | H. Van Cong et al., “A simple accurate expression of the reduced Fermi energy for any reduced carrier density. J. Appl. Phys., vol. 73, pp. 1545-15463, 1993; H. Van Cong and B. Doan Khanh, “Simple accurate general expression of the Fermi-Dirac integral and for j> -1,” Solid-State Electron., vol. 35, pp. 949-951(1992); H. Van Cong, “New series representation of Fermi-Dirac integral for arbitrary j> -1, and its effect on for integer j,” Solid-State Electron., vol. 34, pp. 489-492 (1991). |

[ 4 ] | C. Kittel, “Introduction to Solid State Physics, pp. 84-100. Wiley, New York (1976). |

[ 5 ] | M. A. Green, “Intrinsic concentration, effective density of states, and effective mass in silicon,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 67, 2944-2954 (1990). |

[ 6 ] | H. Van Cong et al., “Optical bandgap in various impurity-Si systems from the metal-insulator transition study,” Physica B, vol. 436, pp. 130-139, 2014; H. Stupp et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 71, p. 2634 (1993); P. Dai et al., Phys. Rev. B, vol. 45, p. 3984 (1992). |

[ 7 ] | H. Van Cong, K. C. Ho-Huynh Thi, et al., “28.68% (29.87%)- Limiting Highest Efficiencies obtained in Crystalline Silicon Junction Solar Cells at 300K, Due to the Effects of Heavy (Low) Doping and Impurity Size, “SCIREA J. Phys., vol.7, pp. 160-179, 2022; H. Van Cong, K. C. Ho-Huynh Thi, et al., “30.76% (42.73%)-Limiting Highest Efficiencies obtained in Crystalline GaAs Junction Solar Cells at 300K, Due to the Effects of Heavy (Low) Doping and Impurity Size, “SCIREA J. Phys., vo.7, pp. 180-199 (2022). |

[ 8 ] | J. Wagner and J. A. del Alamo, J. Appl. Phys., vol. 63, 425-429 (1988). |

[ 9 ] | P. W. Chapman, O. N. Tufte, J. D. Zook, and D. Long, Phys. Rev. 34, 3291-3295 (1963). |

[ 10 ] | M. Finetti and A. M. Mazzone, J. Appl. Phys. 48, 4597-4600 (1977). |

[ 11 ] | Hyun-Sik Kim et al.,”Characterization of Lorenz number with Seebeck coefficient measurement”, APL Materials 3, 041506 (2015). |