Exploratory Research on Sinicization of Modern Marxism

Volume 4, Issue 2, April 2020     |     PP. 48-85      |     PDF (336 K)    |     Pub. Date: March 9, 2020
DOI:    188 Downloads     4440 Views  


Su Wu-xun, Information science and engineering college of National Hua qiao University, Quanzhou, Fujian, China

According to the modernized Marxism ideological system, the questions of the Marxism sinicization are discussed: 1, The Marxism sinicization in the new democratic revolution stage of China; 2, Faced the current more thorough development of reform and opening up of China, how to assault the fortified positions and overcome difficulties, and how to establish the new type of socialism economy and political system and construct the new socialist culture, the author put forward his own solutions.

Marxism sinicization in the new democratic revolution stage, Sinicization of modern Marxism, Solutions of how to establish the new type of socialism social system

Cite this paper
Su Wu-xun, Exploratory Research on Sinicization of Modern Marxism , SCIREA Journal of Sociology. Volume 4, Issue 2, April 2020 | PP. 48-85.


[ 1 ] Mao Zedong, “Why can the red power of China exist?” , written in Oct, 1928, “Mao Zedong anthology”, Vol. 1, the People's Press, Beijing, 1991.
[ 2 ] In 1972 when the diplomatic relation between China and Japan was just established, the talking of Mao Zedong with Japanese Prime minister Kakuei Tanaka is as follows: Kakuei Tanaka: “ah, I'm sorry ah, we launched a war of aggression and had great harm to China”. Mao Zedong: “do not be sorry, you have work; why do you have work? Because if you were not waging war against China, how could the Communist party be strong? How can we seize power? How can we defeat Chiang Kai-shek?” He thanked Tanaka and “how do we thank you? We don't want your war reparations!”; that translated from “Kakuei Tanaka biography”, Tanaka's original Japanese version; and from “Mao Zedong’ diplomatic selections”, which co-edited by the Ministry of foreign affairs of the People's Republic of China and the Party Literature Research Centre of the central committee of the CPC; Central literature publishing house,1994.
[ 3 ] Nowadays, there is a kind of discussion on the Internet which negates the correctness of Xiao-gang village (in Anhui province) at the beginning of reform and opening up by the present situation. Moreover, it supported their argument with the regret (Is it true still a question?) of the leaders of Xiao-gang village at the present time. The Marxist view was that it was the right thing to do at that time; The implementation of the national rural household contract responsibility system greatly liberated the productive forces in the countryside; just a few years later, all the city supply coupons of agriculture products (including grain ration, food coupon, meat coupon, cotton coupon, and sugar and egg ticket) were to be canceled; that witnessed the great success of reform in the countryside. But with the development of agricultural productivity, the agricultural machinery was widely used and large agricultural machinery was generalized gradually; the prototype of the big agriculture gradually appear, reform and opening up then carried out the reform of the rural land system and the contract management system. At present, it has advanced to the mechanism of independent operation based on collective land ownership and separation of ownership, contract and management rights but each of the three independently operated. Can transfer do the right of contract for the socialization of agriculture and modern agricultural intensive management and their rapid development has laid a solid foundation; this is also in the correct tracks of the agricultural modernization and establishing the big socialized agriculture so it is also correct. In fact those who said these words to discredit the present is to mess up the people's minds in the name of Mao Zedong and try to drag China back to the wrong way of the left-leaning course. Such a plot will not succeed!
[ 4 ] This preface in English was retranslated from the Chinese edition by the author. The Chinese origin is “The florilegium of Marx and Engels”, Vol.2, Edited by Compilation and translation bureau of Marx, Engels, Lenin and Stalin's works, Beijing, the People’s Press, 1966, pp194-195.
[ 5 ] At that time, the British, French and other imperialist countries wanted to lead the Nazi war to the Soviet Union, so they had appeasement policy to the Nazi. The Soviet Union under the leadership of Stalin, of course, wanted to take the Nazis’ spearhead to other countries and win as much peacetime as possible; therefore, they had a peace treaty signed with the Germany Nazi and an agreement, which actually carved up Poland with Nazi; and also had signed a non-aggression treaty with Japan at that time to reduce the stress on the Soviet Union in the east and the pressure of strategic operations in two lines---the west and east; Since the Soviet Union was the only socialist country in the world at that time, we should understand what Stalin did then, not criticize him now; With the development of history, Stalin still firmly led the Soviet people, and cooperated with other countries, to defeat Nazi Germany and Japanese fascist and won the victory of world war II.
[ 6 ] Stalin can be said to be the representative of the most backward stage of the social development stage of Russia; he was born in Georgia, which is the most backward area among the Soviet republics. The means by which he usurped leadership and the political means by which he fought against the so-called Trotskyites (actually were Lenin’s most trusted and appreciated comrades) were grossly unjust. He did not really comprehend Lenin's socialist thoughts, nor did he establish a real socialist economic system.
[ 7 ] Profit, we are here to say, is the residual wealth after the enterprise had taken out all the operating costs and finished the public spending that should be paid to the society (including tax, social responsibility); of course, companies are likely to encounter losses, at this point, the losses of enterprises also must be the joint responsibility of all stakeholders to take various means in bringing the enterprise out of the woods---turning losses into gains; or declare bankruptcy or dissolution of the enterprise and liquidation in accordance with the legal procedures; Because several organic part of the enterprise has explicitly by joint-stock formed an organic whole, they are of one mind bound to be more than other enterprises organized according to other principle to have a huge ability and vitality to overcome difficulties.
[ 8 ] A.Acemoglu and J.Robinson, “WHY NATIONS FAIL”, Crown Business of Random House, Inc. 2012,P.151.
[ 9 ] A.Acemoglu and J.Robinson, “WHY NATIONS FAIL”, Crown Business of Random House, Inc. 2012, P.430.
[ 10 ] —latter note, the 19th congress of the communist party of China made it clear that the communist party of China not only continue to vigorously promote the innovations in the various fields of society in China's reform and opening up: science and technology innovation, system innovation, the innovation of social structure and cultural innovation and so on, but also for the new innovation of construction of the Chinese communist party---ceaseless revolution, self-renewal and constantly improving the party's historical conscious awareness to adapt the historical mission of the Chinese nation and the world history given to the communist party of China!
[ 11 ] Guo Jian-ling, “The historical process and contemporary vision of Marxism sinicization”(in Chinese), “Studies on Marxist Theory in Higher Education”, (ISSN: 2096-1170), 2018,03. pp. 28-30.
[ 12 ] Meng Zeng, “Marxism ideology and three historical leaps of Marxism sinicization”, “Social Sciences in Hunan”, (ISSN: 1009-5675), 2018,05. pp. 20-27.