A REASSESSMENT OF MARX'S THEORY AS A POLITICAL THEORY AND A THEORY OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION

Abstract
I present an assessment of Marx's theory based on a new understanding of the foundations of social science, consisting of two dichotomies. Based on these dichotomies, Marx's theory implicitly assumed alternatives to those of the dominant economic theory of capitalism. However, his theory did not fully conform to these choices. Furthermore, I interpret Marx's theory through Galtung's recent theory of conflict resolution. At the time, Marx's theory represented a major intellectual advance; its enormous relevance in the history of peoples over the last two centuries is also justified by this fact; however, it was ambiguous regarding the type of conflict resolution, whether violent or non-violent. Its ambiguities explain the historical regression of the Marxist movement and the societies subsequently constructed according to its theory. However, I demonstrate that both Marx's theory and the Marxist movement paved the way, for better or worse, for a new, pluralist history of humanity.

Keywords
Marx's theory. Two fundamental dichotomies. Galtung's conflict theory. Marx's theoretical ambiguities. The history of the Marxist movement. The revolutions of the 20th century. Political pluralism.

Cite this paper
Antonino Drago, A REASSESSMENT OF MARX'S THEORY AS A POLITICAL THEORY AND A THEORY OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION , SCIREA Journal of Sociology. Volume 10, Issue 1, February 2026 | PP. 33-60. 10.54647/sociology841530

References

[ 1 ]	Anonymous (1960), "Il proletariato e l'arte", "La scienza e la classe operaia", in Rassegna Sovietica, pp. 184-9.
[ 2 ]	Ben-David J. (1985), The Scientist’s role in Society. A comparative Study, New York: Prentice-Hall.
[ 3 ]	Beyer W. (2002), “The Flaw in the Peoples’ Army”, Peace News, Jun-Jul. https://peacenews.info/node/3985/flaw-peoples-army.
[ 4 ]	Bogdanov A. (1911), Kul'turnye zadachi nashego vremeni (Cultural problems of our times), Moscow.
[ 5 ]	Bogdanov A. (1918), Science and the Working Class, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bogdanov_(1918)_Science_and_the_Working_class.pdf.
[ 6 ]	Bukharin N. et al. (1971), Science at Crossroad, London: Frank Cass.
[ 7 ]	Chenoweth E. and Stephen M.J. (2011), Why Civil Resistance Won. The strategic Logic of Nonviolent Conflict, New York: Columbia U.P..
[ 8 ]	Clausewitz K. (1832), On War, http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/clausewitz-on-war-vol-1
[ 9 ]	Drago A. (1988), “A Characterization of Newtonian Paradigm”, in Scheurer P.B., Debrock O. (eds.): Newton’s Scientific ami Philosophical Legacy, Dordrecht: Kluwer Acad. P., pp. 239-252.
[ 10 ]	Drago A. (2007), “The birth of Non-violence as a Political theory”, Gandhi Marg, 29, no. 3 oct.-nov., 275-295
[ 11 ]	Drago A. (2010), Le rivoluzioni non-violente nell’ultimo secolo. I fatti e le interpretazioni, Roma: Quale Cultura.
[ 12 ]	Drago A. (2012), “Pluralism in Logic. The Square of opposition, Leibniz’s principle and Markov’s principle”, in Béziau J.-Y. e Jacquette D. (eds.), Around and Beyond the Square of Opposition, Basel: Birckhaueser, pp. 175-189.
[ 13 ]	Drago A. (2013), “The emergence of two options from Einstein’s first paper on Quanta, in Pisano R., Capecchi D., Lukesova A. (eds.), Physics, Astronomy and Engineering. Critical Problems in the History of Science and Society, Scientia Socialis P., Siauliai, pp. 227-234.
[ 14 ]	Drago A. (2016a), “New Interpretative Categories for Natural and Social Sciences”, Advances in Historical Studies, 5, pp. 223-239, http://www.scirp.org/journal/ahs:
[ 15 ]	Drago A. (2016b), "Improving Galtung’s A-B-C to a scientific theory of all kinds of conflicts”, Ars Brevis. Anuari de la Càtedra Ramon Llull Blanquerna, 21, pp. 56-91.
[ 16 ]	Drago A. (2017a), Dalla storia della Fisica alla scoperta dei fondamenti della Scienza, Aracne, Roma.
[ 17 ]	Drago A. (2017b), “Koyré’s revolutionary role in the Historiography of Science”, in Pisano R., Agassi J., Drozdova D. (eds.), Hypotheses and Perspectives in the History and Philosophy of Science. Homage to Alexandre Koyré 1892-1964, Berlin: Springer, pp. 123-141.
[ 18 ]	Drago A., Vitiello O. (1990), “The cycle method vs. the analytical method in thermodynamics”, in A. Diez, J. Echeverria, A. Ibai (eds.), Structures in Mathematical Theories, San Sebastian, pp. 349-356.
[ 19 ]	Feyerabend P.K. (1975), Against Method. Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge, London: New Left Books.
[ 20 ]	Habermas J. (1989), The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[ 21 ]	Jaurès J. (1911), L’armée Nouvelle, Paris: L’Humanité.
[ 22 ]	Koyré A. (1957), From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe, Baltimore MD: U. Maryland P.
[ 23 ]	Kuhn T.S. (1969), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: Chicago U.P..
[ 24 ]	Marx K. (1867), Das Kapital, Hamburg: O. Meissner.
[ 25 ]	Marx K. (1983), Mathematical Manuscripts, New York: New Park. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/Marx_Mathematical_Manuscripts_1881.pdf
[ 26 ]	Schaff A. (1973) “Marxist Theory on Revolution and Violence”, J. of History of Ideas, 34, 2, 263-279.
[ 27 ]	Scherrer J. (1979), Bogdanov e Lenin: il bolscevismo al bivio, in Storia del Marxismo, Torino: Einaudi, vol. 2, pp. 493-546.
[ 28 ]	Sohn-Rethel A. (1975), "Science as an alienated consciousness", Rad. Sci. J., no. 2-3, pp. 65-101.
[ 29 ]	Weber M. (1992), The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, London: Routledge.
[ 30 ]	Wikipedia: “Ferdinand Domela Nieuwenhuis”, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferdinand_Domela_Nieuwenhuis